Monday, 15 April 2013

Federation In Meltdown

Steve Williams - Chair of the Police Federation of England and Wales
 
 
I spotted this article in The Independent regarding current issues within the Police Federation. I don't normally read that rag; the only thing it is independent of are any views from anyone who isn't a Socialist.
 
I am not sure that the current divisions in the Police Federation concern more power going to the centre. The issues in the Federation centre around The Met, The Constables and the Principal Officers of the Joint Central Committee.The Met accounts for almost a quarter of the membership of the Federation. Constables make up more than 70% of the membership.
 
For decades there has been talk of The Met and Constables declaring UDI and going independent of the National Federation. These tensions invariably increase when the National Federation has been perceived to fail to represent their members effectively. Tensions further increase when senior positions in the National  Federation are not occupied by Metropolitan Officers or Constables.
 
Ian Rennie - General Secretary of the Police Federation of England and Wales
 
 
Paul McKeever was a Metropolitan Police Sergeant and, until his untimely death at the beginning of this year was, in my opinion, one of the finest Chairs of the National Federation we have seen. Paul was very much focused on diplomacy, influence and negotiation. Paul did his best to clamp down on Force Federation officials becoming too vocal over the Plebgate affair, but was ignored by some and this caused significant damage. Paul understood that Plebgate might result in a Government led review of the Federation and he was the architect of the current review. He believed that the Federation submitting to an independent review would obviate any possible Government led review.
 
Following Paul’s resignation, and shortly before his death, Steve Williams, an Inspector from North Wales was elected as the new Chair. His arrival coincided with the Home Secretary, Theresa May, announcing the Governments decisions on the Winsor review. There was no good news for the Federation. Negotiations were seen to have been totally ineffective and Winsor’s recommendations were almost all accepted, resulting in huge losses to police pay and conditions. In a clever move though, May deferred any decision on compulsory severance until July.
 
Under pressure from local Forces the National Federation had been instructed at Conference to hold a ballot  on industrial rights. This was seen as a means of letting the Government know that officers had had enough. The National Federation did not want the ballot and dragged their heels over it. The ballot was eventually arranged for February.
Many people, myself included, believed that the ballot should have been postponed until after the decision on compulsory severance was made. Police officers have always been regarded as servants of The Crown and normal employment law does not apply to them. With the already accepted changes to rights overturned by Winsor, compulsory severance would mean the police being treated almost no differently to any other employee. In that case they should have the same industrial rights.
The ballot went ahead in February. It was poorly organised and advertised. The Fed hierarchy added a self imposed twist. They said the ballot would have no effect unless more than 50% of the electorate voted in favour of industrial rights. The ballot was an inevitable failure. Only 42% of officers voted although 81% of those that did, voted for industrial rights.
The ballot was an own goal for the Federation and gives the Government the green light to impose compulsory severance and any other changes they might wish to. All the new Chair of the Federation, Steve Williams, could say was "it would not be appropriate to undertake a course of action that could potentially change the employment status of more than 133,000 police officers if fewer than half of those officers have voted for us to do so." He seems to have missed the point that the special employment status has already gone.
Will Riches - Chair of the Constables Central Committee
 
We now have a belligerent, Met Chair of the Constables Committee, Will Riches, combined with frustrations regarding the apparent ineffectiveness of non Met and non Constable rank Principal Officers leading the Federation. The Plebgate review is seen by the militants as further capitulation to the Government who have already run roughshod all over the police.
One thing is for certain. Federation blood is going to be spilt over the carpets at the swanky HQ in Leatherhead, Surrey. Whether that blood is the Chair, Steve Williams, Secretary, Ian Rennie or the aforementioned Will Riches we will have to wait and see.
The main point though is that the Federation need to resolve their squabbles and get their act together and start representing their members. They have failed to achieve almost anything for members in the wake of Winsor and officers are beginning to leave the Federation in their droves. They can no longer afford the membership fees and have seen little return for their investment. If the Federation don't start representing members effectively, and soon, they will find they represent no-one.

5 comments:

  1. Ferenda - some good news for you - the Indy is going right wing (Lebedev wants a Knighthood and is selling out at a rate of knots) In fact it will soon be plod's fave paper - it bans anti-police comments - bit like you eh? Finally, one hears it will kick off at Thatcher's funeral (you can delete the next bit) I hope you get what you richly deserve - we need a Blakelock moment!

    ReplyDelete
  2. My prediction for the funeral is that the usual feral scum, of which "Colonel Rehill" appears to be one, will cause disorder and cause injuries and damage.

    But, on the basis of "Remember Tomlinson", and the fact that any seriously-injured officer will almost inevitably lose their job because of the requirement for all officers to be 100% fit for duty, the policing will be light-handed and the general public will be critical, demanding to know (like the media today about football violence) why policing wasn't more robust.

    The Home Office will say it's down to Police and Crime Commissioners (because that is why PCCs were introduced, to be scapegoats for the collapse of policing due to low morale and 23% budget cuts), and the media will further denigrate policing, because that's what sells newspapers.

    No-one will be interested in fixing anything, because it's too horribly broken already.

    Maybe G4S will step in - after all, the private sector is the answer to everything, isn't it? (Not...)

    ReplyDelete
  3. So, it's just the Federation in meltdown. What a relief, lex.

    ".... and the media will further denigrate policing, because that's what sells newspapers."

    Poppycock. Every fool and his police dog already knows that the big corruption story sells newspapers. It is often for that reason alone that police are the lead story.

    ReplyDelete
  4. You made some good points there. I looked on the web for more information about the issue and
    found most individuals will go along with your views on this web site.


    Have a look at my blog; exercises to improve vertical leap

    ReplyDelete
  5. I'm not sure why but this site is loading very slow for me. Is anyone else having this issue or is it a problem on my end? I'll check back later and see if the problem still exists.



    my blog post Verticaljump.Einfohound.Com

    ReplyDelete